<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JPSIM</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine</journal-title>
        <abbrev-title>J Pak Soc Intern Med</abbrev-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2709-8729</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2710-0804</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.70302/jpsim.v1i1.2018</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jpsim.v1i1.2018</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>STUDENT CORNER</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Frequency and Outcome of Adverse Events in Hospitalized and Critically ill Patients</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Memon</surname>
            <given-names>Areeba</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Arshad</surname>
            <given-names>Ainan</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>ainan_arshad@hotmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Naeem</surname>
            <given-names>Rehab</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Ayaz</surname>
            <given-names>Ahmed</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Raza</surname>
            <given-names>Abbas</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Pasha</surname>
            <given-names>Kamran</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <institution>Aga Khan Medical College, Karachi – Pakistan</institution>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff2">
        <institution>Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi – Pakistan</institution>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">*Correspondence: Ainan Arshad (ainan_arshad@hotmail.com)</corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2020-12-16">
        <day>16</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>78</fpage>
      <lpage>83</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-09-05">
          <day>05</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-10-12">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>The Author(s)</copyright-holder>
        <ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
          <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://psimj.com/article/jpsim.v1i1.2018" content-type="text/html"/>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://psimj.com/article/jpsim.v1i1.2018.pdf" content-type="application/pdf"/>
      <abstract>
        <p>Objectives</p>
        <p>To identify Frequency and outcome of adverse events in hospitalized critically ill patients</p>
        <p>Methods</p>
        <p>This is a retrospective case-control study of critically ill ICU patients was conducted from January-December 2019 at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Pakistan. Data was collected from patients’ medical records using a pre-approved pro forma. Variables included demographics, patient and hospitalization characteristics and laboratory investigations. Any adverse event during the admission was also noted. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and length of stay.</p>
        <p>Results</p>
        <p>773 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study; 504 (65.2%) were males and 269 (34.8%) females; mean age was 57.3 ± 16.6 years. Overall mortality rate was 33%. The most common adverse events during a patients hospital stay were acute kidney injury (22%), shock (18%) and electrolyte imbalance (18%). Risk factors for mortality in these patients included mechanical ventilation, septic shock, acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, seizures, acute liver failure, ARDS and metabolic acidosis.</p>
        <p>Conclusion</p>
        <p>Our study reveals a high mortality rate for critically ill ICU patients. Adverse events during admission were frequent and also associated with increased mortality. We hope this study sets the stage for larger scale studies in developing countries to drive improvements in accurate risk stratification and optimal patient management.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en" kwd-group-type="author-keywords">
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Critical care</kwd>
        <kwd>ICU</kwd>
        <kwd>shock</kwd>
        <kwd>outcome</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Objectives</title>
      <p>To identify Frequency and outcome of adverse events in hospitalized critically ill patients</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>This is a retrospective case-control study of critically ill ICU patients was conducted from January-December 2019 at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Pakistan. Data was collected from patients’ medical records using a pre-approved pro forma. Variables included demographics, patient and hospitalization characteristics and laboratory investigations. Any adverse event during the admission was also noted. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and length of stay.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>773 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study; 504 (65.2%) were males and 269 (34.8%) females; mean age was 57.3 ± 16.6 years. Overall mortality rate was 33%. The most common adverse events during a patients hospital stay were acute kidney injury (22%), shock (18%) and electrolyte imbalance (18%). Risk factors for mortality in these patients included mechanical ventilation, septic shock, acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, seizures, acute liver failure, ARDS and metabolic acidosis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Our study reveals a high mortality rate for critically ill ICU patients. Adverse events during admission were frequent and also associated with increased mortality. We hope this study sets the stage for larger scale studies in developing countries to drive improvements in accurate risk stratification and optimal patient management.</p>
      <p><bold>Keywords</bold> Critical care, ICU, shock, outcome</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>How to cite this</title>
      <p>Memon A, Arshad A, Naeem R, Ayaz A, Raza A, Pasha K. Frequency and outcome of adverse events in hospitalized critically ill patients. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2020;1(1):</p>
      <p><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Dr. Ainan Arshad. Email: ainan_arshad@hotmail.com</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>An Intensive Care Unit (ICU) caters to patients with serious illnesses in order to provide the treatment critical for their survival such as mechanical ventilation, frequent invasive monitoring and vasopressor supports.1 Accidental or poor outcomes in a health care setting are described as adverse events. These are quite frequent in ICU patients and can be the result of the vulnerabilities of patients’ health condition due to pre-existing risk factors or comorbidities; complications of care; or the large number of procedures to which ICU patients are subjected such as the insertion of central lines, hemodialysis catheters and bronchoscopies.2</p>
      <p>There are approximately 4 million ICU admissions per year in the United States with reported average mortality rates ranging from 8-19%.3 In comparison, a 2017 study carried out in Pakistan, a developing country, showed a mean mortality rate of 50% with the highest mortality observed in patients admitted due to neurotrauma (72%) followed by patients with pulmonary diseases (68%).4</p>
      <p>While there are many studies of the reasons for high mortality rates in ICUs in developed countries there is limited data on the situation in developing countries. Moreover, although ICUs are high-mortality areas, data on the predictors of mortality in an ICU setting is quite low. We have therefore conducted this study to determine the risk factors leading to high mortality rates among patients on an ICU ward in a developing country.</p>
      <p>The prognosis of a patient admitted to ICU depends on their comorbidity status, existing risk factors and history of recurrent hospital admissions. Some of the most significant contributors to hospital mortality were the presence of comorbidities and advanced age.5 The prevalence of comorbid conditions may predispose patients to a range of complications or organ dysfunction. The most common comorbid conditions encountered in an ICU setting are diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic liver disease.6 The patient’s prognosis is therefore determined by the severity of their presenting illness and the existence of additional chronic diseases as the presence of comorbidities leads to an increase in the risk of adverse outcomes and any complications the patient may experience during their stay at the ICU. This may increase the length of their stay in the ICU and the hospital and in turn lead to an even greater risk of health care associated infections.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Methodology</title>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Study Setting</title>
      <p>The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Aga Khan University, Karachi. We included all adult ICU patients admitted to AKUH from January to December 2019. Patients who left against medical advice were excluded from the study. Data was collected from the medical records of all included patients using a pre-approved pro forma. Data variables included demographics, patient and hospitalization characteristics and laboratory investigations. Any adverse event during the admission was also noted. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and length of stay.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Data Analysis</title>
      <p>IBM SPSS statistics 21 was used for data analysis. Chi square test was used for the comparison of categorical variables. Demographic characteristics were identified using descriptive statistics and the odds ratio was calculated to check for any association between mortality and risk factors. In order to measure the significance of the results, a P-value of &lt;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p>
      <p><bold>Results</bold> 822 ICU patients were admitted to AKUH from March 2019 to December 2019. 773 (94%) patients met the inclusion criteria and were studied in detail. 504 (65.2%) were males and 269 (34.8%) females; mean age was 57.3 ± 16.6 years. The overall demographics, patient and hospitalization characteristics are presented in <bold>Table 1</bold>. Comorbid conditions like ischemic heart disease (p = &lt;0.001), hypertension (p = &lt;0.001), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.001) and chronic liver disease(p = 0.001) are significantly associated with increased mortality. In addition, mechanical ventilation, septic shock, acute kidney injury, thrombocytopenia and leukocytosis were among a range of hospitalization factors strongly associated with mortality (p = &lt;0.001). Logistic regression analysis was carried out on the risk factors to evaluate their ability to correctly predict the outcome <bold>(Table 2)</bold>. The following risk factors were significant predictors of mortality: sepsis (OR=7.4, P = &lt;0.001), seizures (OR=5.7, , P = 0.004), respiratory failure (OR = 10.6, , P = &lt;0.001), metabolic acidosis (OR= 48.0, , P = &lt;0.001).</p>
      <p><bold>Table 3</bold> shows that complications can significantly affect mortality rates as indicated by their high chi square values and P-values of &lt;0.001. Acute liver failure was linked with the highest mortality risk (95.2%) followed by ARDS (90.2%) and septic shock (88.7%).</p>
      <p><bold>Discussion</bold> Historically, several attempts have been made to identify the predictors of mortality. However, these studies have been very specific; taking only one or two variables into account.7,8 Our study looks at several factors to define the various predictors of mortality from the time of admission to the time of discharge. It shows that hypertension, diabetes and ischemic heart diseases are the most prevalent comorbid conditions in our participants. This finding is consistent with previous studies conducted in Asia and particularly, Pakistan.9,10 It may be attributed to low awareness and limited understanding of these diseases among individuals and thus poor management of these diseases. Moreover, comorbid conditions like chronic kidney disease and chronic liver disease increase the risk of mortality. Several epidemiological studies suggest that even a mild increase in the serum creatinine is correlated with a higher mortality risk.11 According to a study carried out in 2017, liver cirrhosis is the 13th most common cause of death around the world.12 The high prevalence of hepatitis B and Hepatitis C in developing countries could be a contributing factor in the majority of chronic liver disease cases in our study population.13 Mechanical ventilation is also strongly associated with increased mortality due to related complications such as oxygen toxicity, barotrauma and hemodynamic compromise.14 The ultimate goal of mechanical ventilation should be to provide life-sustaining gas exchange while limiting or minimizing ventilator-induced lung damage. Various ventilation strategies such as low tidal volumes and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) have been used to minimize mechanical ventilation damage and have yielded positive outcomes.15,16 Larger studies are needed to further validate these results.</p>
      <p>Electrolytic imbalances are also frequently found in ICU settings as 37.5% of the patients who died and were included in our study developed electrolyte imbalances during their stay. There can be several reasons for this. A study carried out in 2010 shows medications as one of the possible causes as drugs may interfere with electrolytic absorption, modify hormonal responses influencing homeostasis and directly influence the function of an organ responsible for the preservation of the electrolyte balance.17Despite improvements in supportive care, ARDS also contributes to a high mortality rate. In order to manage ARDS, a number of interventions especially around the use of ventilators have been proposed but their implementation is hampered under recognition of ARDS by clinicians.18</p>
      <p>The logistic regression model explains 54.7% (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.547) of the variance in the outcome and correctly classified 85.3% of the cases after adjusting for age, gender and Charlson index. Metabolic acidosis is a commonly occurring acid-base disorder in ICU settings.19 <bold>Table 2 </bold>shows that patients with metabolic acidosis were 48 times more likely to die compared to those without it. Similarly, patients with either sepsis, respiratory failure or seizures were also at greater risk of dying than those without these conditions. Thus, our study clearly shows the importance of closely monitoring patients with the complications mentioned above to avoid adverse outcomes in a critical care setting.</p>
      <p>Our results showed that commonly occurring acute kidney injury and septic shock were associated with increased mortality. <bold>Table 3</bold> shows that 88.7% of patients who developed septic shock died of it while 71.7% of those with acute kidney injuries did not survive. These percentages are concerning in a critical care unit setting. Patients surviving an episode of acute kidney injury are most likely to have recurrent episodes which could lead to increased risk of mortality.20</p>
      <p>Analysis of the cohorts’ lab results such as hemoglobin levels, total leukocyte count, platelet count and sodium levels revealed anemia as the most prevalent underlying condition. A recent 2020 study shows that hepcidin overexpression exists in critically ill patients which may lead to decreased utilization of iron and is the most likely cause of anemia in these patients.21 Another significant finding in our analysis is the insignificance of the charlson comorbidity index as a mortality indicator in our study population. This needs to be explored in detail with further studies based on a larger sample size.</p>
      <p>Our findings provide a general indication of the factors determining the prognosis of ICU patients and can offer a basis for the planning of directed treatment of patients admitted to critical care units to help mitigate adverse outcomes.</p>
      <p>Our study however has certain limitations as the sample group contained adult population and thus the findings cant be extended or generalized to pediatric population. Moreover, This study is limited to one centre and might not representative of the entire population.</p>
      <p><bold>Conclusion</bold> Our study reveals a high mortality rate for critically ill ICU patients at a large tertiary hospital in a developing country. There were frequent adverse events during the patients stay in the ICU and these were in turn associated with increased mortality. We hope this study sets the stage for larger scale studies of the factors affecting patient mortality in an ICU setting in developing countries to deliver improvements in accurate risk stratification and optimal management of ICU patients.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>Johnson AEW, Mark RG. Real-time mortality prediction in the Intensive Care Unit. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;994‐1003. PMC5977709.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1995;23(2):294-300.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>Siddiqui S. Mortality profile across our Intensive Care Units: A 5-year database report from a Singapore restructured hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19(12):726-7.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rahat Ullah A, Hussain A, Ali I, Samad A, Shah STA, Yousef M, et al . A prospective observational study assessing the outcome of Sepsis in intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital, Peshawar. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(3):688-93.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>Yang Y, Yang KS, Hsann YM, Lim V, Ong BC. The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):398‐405.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>Esper AM, Martin GS. The impact of comorbid conditions on critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(3):1043.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ding Y, Jeon R, Ran L, Pan W, Wang F, Li Q. New-onset QT prolongation is a novel predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):229.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation>Silveira DC, Sagi A, Romero R. Are seizures predictors of mortality in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)? Seizure. 2019;73:14‐16.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation>Basit A, Tanveer S, Fawwad A, Naeem N; NDSP Members. Prevalence and contributing risk factors for hypertension in urban and rural areas of Pakistan; a study from second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP) 2016-2017. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020;42(3):218‐224.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation>Soenarta, AA, Buranakitjaroen, P, Chia, Y‐C, et al. An overview of hypertension and cardiac involvement in Asia: Focus on heart failure. J Clin Hypertens. 2020; 22: 423– 430.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation>Muntner P, He J, Hamm L, Loria C, Whelton PK. Renal insufficiency and subsequent death resulting from cardiovascular disease in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(3):745‐753.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation>Abbas N, Makker J, Abbas H, Balar B. Perioperative Care of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Review. Health Serv Insights. 2017; <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1178632917691270</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation>Mehmood S, Raza H, Abid F, Saeed N, Rehan HM, Javed S, et al. National prevalence rate of hepatitis B and C in Pakistan and its risk factors. Springer: J Public Health. 2020:28(7);751-64.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation>Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury N Engl J Med. 2014;370(17):1668-9.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lanspa MJ, Gong MN, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Prospective Assessment of the Feasibility of a Trial of Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(3):356‐62.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation>van der Zee P, Gommers D. Recruitment Maneuvers and Higher PEEP, the So-Called Open Lung Concept, in Patients with ARDS. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):73.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation>Buckley MS, LeBlanc JM, Cawley MJJCcm. Electrolyte disturbances associated with commonly prescribed medications in the intensive care unit. 2010;38(6): S253-64.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016;316(3):350.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation>Moviat M, van Haren F, van der Hoeven H. Conventional or physicochemical approach in intensive care unit patients with metabolic acidosis. Crit Care. 2003;7(3):R41‐5.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation>Walker H, De Souza N, Hapca S, Witham MD, Bell SJCKJ. Effect of multiple episodes of acute kidney injury on mortality: an observational study. Clin Kidney J. 2020; <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ckj/sfz199</pub-id>.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lindberg G, Potenza B, Nemeth E, Collier B. 539: critically ill patients overexpress hepcidin, become anemic and resistant to erythropoietin therapy. Crit Care Med.2020;48(1):250.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
