Original Research

Quality of Life After Rhinoplasty In Adult Population of an Urban Setting

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v1i1.2009
Received: 26 Sep 2020 Accepted: 16 Oct 2020 Published Online: 16 Dec 2020

Abstract

Objective

To determine the relationship between Rhinoplasty and quality of life (QOL) and its association with gender.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was carried out on apparently healthy individuals who willingly opted for nose job and gave permissions to be enrolled in the study. Interviews were also conducted with the study participants.
Results
Our study included a total of 62 cases of Rhinoplasty of which 31 were males and 31 were females. All the cases (100%) were satisfied with their sense of smell. Few females (35.4%) as compared to 83.8% males were satisfied with overall attractiveness and symmetry of their nose after Rhinoplasty, 41.9% females applied makeup to improve the appearance of their nose, 74.2% females as compared to 87.1% males were satisfied with breathing during routine tasks and exercise, 29% females complained of irritation and nasal obstruction whereas the 19.4% males had same complaints. Only 3.3% females had complaints of anxiety and depression after Rhinoplasty. A total of 80.6% females and 93.5% males reported an improvement in their QOL after Rhinoplasty.
Conclusion
Striking variations in some factors affecting QOL after rhinoplasty in each gender was reported with the greatest difference being in satisfaction with post rhinoplasty nasal appearance. Satisfaction about the overall attractiveness of nose was much higher in men than in women.

Keywords
Rhinoplasty Quality of Life Nasal Irritation Congestion Breathing Nose Appearance.

How to Cite This Article

Afzal S, Bashir M, Sultan S, Fatima A, Jaffar M, Baig S, et al.. Quality of Life After Rhinoplasty In Adult Population of an Urban Setting. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2020;1(1):35–40. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v1i1.2009

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Wikepedia.org. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia; 2016[updated 2016 March 9]. Available from: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinoplasty]
  2. Arneja JS. Medscape 2015[updated 2016 April 09: 2016 march 29]. Available from: [http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1292131-overview]
  3. Vartany A. M.D. American board of plastic surgery. 2016 [updated 2016 January 15: cited 2020]. Available from: [http://www.vartany.com/open-rhinoplasty.htmlcited]
  4. Litner JA, Rotenberg BW, Dennis M, Adamson PA. Impact of Cosmetic Facial Surgery on Satistaction with Appearance and Quality of Life. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008; 10(2):79-83
  5. Rohrich, Rod J, James B, Michael R. The Role of Open Rhinoplast in the Management of Nasal Dermoid Cysts. J Am Soc Plastic Surg.1999; 104(5):p 1459.
  6. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC. Rhinoplasty: An Outcome Research. Plastic Reconst Surg. 2008; 121(1):251 -57.
  7. Sam P. Analysis of Outcomes After Functional Rhinoplasty Using a Disease Specific Quality of Life Instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006; 8. (5): 306.
  8. Kamburoğlu HO, Ozgür F. Postoperative satisfaction and the patient's body image, life satisfaction, and self-esteem: a retrospective study comparing adolescent girls and boys after cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(6):739-45.
  9. Naraghi M, Amirzargar B, Meysamie A. Quality of life comparison in common rhinologic surgeries. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2012; 3(1): 1–7
  10. 10. BaumannI. Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2010; 9(1):Doc06.
  11. Zoumalan RA, Constantinides M. Subjective and Objective improvement in breathing after Rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(6):423-8.
  12. Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O. Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery.Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):254-9.
  13. Most SP. Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument.Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8(5):306-9.
  14. Thapa N, Pradhan B. Psychosocial Impact of External Nasal Deformity before and After Rhinoplasty. Pak J Otolaryngol. 2014; 30(1):68-70.
  15. Erdogan BA, Avseren E, Paksoy M, Bora F, Altin G. Assessing quality of life in septorhinoplasty patients with two different instruments. B-ENT. 2013;9(4):277-83.
  16. Meningaud JP, Lantieri L, Bertrand JC. Rhinoplasty: an outcome research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(1):251-7.
  17. Zojaji R, Javanbakht M, Ghanadan A, Hosien H, Sadeghi H. High prevalence of personality abnormalities in patients seeking rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(1):83-7.
  18. Rastmanesh R, Gluck ME, Shadman Z. Comparison of body dissatisfaction and cosmetic rhinoplasty with levels of veil practicing in Islamic women. Int J Eat Disord. 2009;42(4):339-45.
  19. Jacobson WE, Edgerton MT, Meyer E, Canter A, Slaughter R. Psychiatric evaluation of the male patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;26(1):356-72.
  20. Goin MK, Burgoyne RW, Goin J, Staples FR. A prospective psychological study of 50 female face-lift patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65(4):436-42.
  21. Sam P. Analysis of Outcomes after functional Rhinoplasty using a Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg.2006;8(5):306.
  22. Marcus P. Psychological aspects of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37(4):313-8.
  23. Mckiernan DC, Banfield G, Kumar R, Hinton AE. Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.2001;26(1):50-2.
  24. Robin AA, Copas JB, Jack AB, Kaeser AC, Thomas PJ. Reshaping the psyche: The concurrent improvement in appearance and mental state after rhinoplasty. Br J Psychiatry. 1988;152(4):539.
  25. Briner HR, Simmen D, Jones N. Impaired sense of smell in patients with nasal surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28(5):417-9.
  26. Oosterkamp BC, Dijkstra PU, Remmelink HJ, van Oort RP, Goorhuis Brouwer SM, Sandham A, de Bont LG. Satisfaction with treatment outcome in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(10):890-95.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2020 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.