Original Research

Training Future Doctors on Screen a Hit or a Miss During Covid

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v2i2.2129
Received: 05 Jan 2021 Accepted: 25 Apr 2021 Published Online: 17 Jun 2021

Abstract

Objective

Research was conducted amongst undergraduate medical students to compare how their scores and
performance differed when assessed online with various tools like Socrative and Zoom and at the bedside in real time.

Methods

Data was collected from exam records of 48 students retrospectively and results were compiled.

Results

It was observed that 62.5% students scored above 70% in the socrative scoring and a gradual decrease was
observed in as 39.6% scored above 70% by zoom scoring while only 2.1% in real time scoring system.

Conclusion

We concluded that bedside teaching and clerkship is a significant contributor to student performance. Elearning, while has revolutionized teaching in covid times, needs to be modified in ways to accommodate this aspect.

Keywords
E learning Clinical skills medical education.

How to Cite This Article

Qaisar W, Latif S, Waseem T. Training Future Doctors on Screen a Hit or a Miss During Covid. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2021;2(2):119–122. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v2i2.2129

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2020 May;36(COVID19-S4):S27.
  2. Schneider SL, Council ML. Distance learning in the era of COVID-19. Archives of dermatological research. 2020 May 8:1-2.
  3. Fazio SB, Ledford CH, Aronowitz PB, Chheda SG, Choe JH, Call SA, Gitlin SD, Muntz M, Nixon LJ, Pereira AG, Ragsdale JW. Competency-based medical education in the internal medicine clerkship: a report from the alliance for academic internal medicine undergraduate medical education task force. Academic Medicine. 2018 Mar 1;93(3):421-7.
  4. Al-Elq AH. Medicine and clinical skills laboratories. Journal of family & community medicine.
  5. Rider EA, Hinrichs MM, Lown BA. A model for communication skills assessment across the undergraduate curriculum. Medical teacher. 2006 Jan 1;28(5):e127-34.
  6. Farooq F, Rathore FA, Mansoor SN. Challenges of online medical education in Pakistan during COVID-19 pandemic. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Jun 1;30(6):67-9.
  7. Eurboonyanun C, Wittayapairoch J, Aphinives P, Petrusa E, Gee DW, Phitayakorn R. Adaptation to open-book online examination during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education. 2021 May 1;78(3):737-9.
  8. Batool H, Mumtaz A, Ali S, Chughtai AS. Positive trend shifting to Online Assessments: A Review of using Socrative in Medical College, its Advantages and Challenges faced. Journal of Medical Education. 2018 Jan 1;17(3):160-7.
  9. Boston C. The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2002;8(1):9.
  10. Haring CM, Cools BM, van der Meer JW, Postma CT. Student performance of the general physical examination in internal medicine: an observational study. BMC Medical education. 2014 Dec;14(1):1-6.
  11. Oyedokun A, Adeloye D, Balogun O. Clinical history-taking and physical examination in medical practice in Africa: still relevant?. Croatian medical journal. 2016 Dec;57(6):605.
  12. Modi JN, Chhatwal J, Gupta P, Singh T. Teaching and assessing communication skills in medical undergraduate training. Indian pediatrics. 2016 53(6):497-504.Jun;
  13. Humphris GM, Kaney S. Assessing the development of communication skills in undergraduate medical students. Medical education. 2001 Mar;35(3):225-31.
  14. Windish DM, Price EG, Clever SL, Magaziner JL, Thomas PA. Teaching medical students the important connection between communication and clinical reasoning. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2005 Dec;20(12):1108-13.
  15. Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J, Moeltner A, Ruesseler M, Bender B, Sterz J, Schuettler KF, Koenig S, Kreuder JG. Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam–a study at five medical schools. BMC medical education. 2017 Dec;17(1):1-7.
  16. Arndt CB, Guly UM, McManus IC. Preclinical anxiety: the stress associated with a viva voce examination. Medical education. 1986 Jul;20(4):274-80.
  17. Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine. 2021 Feb 19;100(7).
  18. Rahm AK, Töllner M, Hubert MO, Klein K, Wehling C, Sauer T, Hennemann HM, Hein S, Kender Z, Günther J, Wagenlechner P. Effects of realistic e-learning cases on students’ learning motivation during COVID-19. PloS one. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0249425.
  19. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. Jama. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131-2.
  20. Sandhu P, de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum. Medical Education Online. 2020 Jan 1;25(1):1764740.
  21. Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Von Hales D, Smith NL, Staker LV. Contributions of the history, physical examination, and laboratory investigation in making medical diagnoses. Western Journal of Medicine. 1992 Feb;156(2):163.
  22. Asif T, Mohiuddin A, Hasan B, Pauly RR. Importance of thorough physical examination: a lost art. Cureus. 2017 May;9(5).
  23. Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus. 2020 Mar;12(3).

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2021 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.