STUDENT CORNER

Medico-Legal Review of Burns a Retrospective Study in Forensic Department of KEMU Lahore

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v3i1.2215
Received: 16 Nov 2021 Accepted: 08 Jan 2022 Published Online: 15 Mar 2022

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the demography, etiology and clinical features of burns reported at Mayo hospital; Lahore in 2019.

Methods

The data of this retrospective study were collected from the records of medicolegal clinic from January 2019 to December 2019, after approval from the institutional review board, and analyzed using SPSS v23. The difference of proportions between variables, was calculated by Pearson Chi-square test and Fischer Exact test at 95% confidence interval.

Results

present results showed that males (60%) were more affected. Most of the victims were toddlers and children (50%), followed by young adults (23%) and then elders (17%). Scald burns were the most commonly acquired type (57%), then dry burns (37%), and lastly electrocuted burns (6%). 70% of the cases had 10%-50% body surface area involved, 23% had less than 10% of the body surface consumed. 2nd degree burns were most prevalent (75.5%). 91% of the victims were conscious and vitally stable, and were presented to the hospital within 1 hour of the injury.

Conclusion

In view of the conducted research, it's evident that wet burn is the most prevalent type of burn, especially in children due to their mischievous behavior. Most of the cases are accidental.

Keywords
Burn Medicolegal Injury Distribution

How to Cite This Article

Naeem M, Shah M. Medico-Legal Review of Burns a Retrospective Study in Forensic Department of KEMU Lahore. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2022;3(1):69–73. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v3i1.2215

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Seema N, Ahmad I, Mughal S, Khan D, Khan O. Frequency and types of bodily medico-legal injuries in a rural area. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010;22(2):93-5.
  2. Barek A, Haque ST. Medicolegal aspects of hurt, injury and wound. Anwer Khan Mod Med Coll J. 2013;4(2):37–41.
  3. Licit. The facts you should know about Medico legal cases! [Updated 2020, cited 2022]. Available from website: [https://medium.com/@Licit_GoLegal/the-facts-you-should-know-about-medico-legal-cases-33c733807f09]
  4. Shiel Jr W. Medical Definition of Burn. [Updated 2020, cited 2022]. Available from website: [https://www.medicinenet.com/burn/definition.htm]
  5. Batra AK. Burn mortality: recent trends and sociocultural determinants in rural India. Burns. 2003;29(3):270–5.
  6. Mohammadi AA, Tohidinik HR, Zardosht M, Jafari SMS. Self-burns in fars province, southern Iran. World J Plast Surg. 2016;5(1):32.
  7. Padovese V, De Martino R, Eshan MA, Racalbuto V, Oryakhail MA. Epidemiology and outcome of burns in Esteqlal Hospital of Kabul, Afghanistan. Burns. 2010;36(7):1101–6.
  8. Zheng Y, Lin G, Zhan R, Qian W, Yan T, Sun L, et al. Epidemiological analysis of 9,779 burn patients in China: An eight‑year retrospective study at a major burn center in southwest China. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(4):2847–54.
  9. Ahmed A, Khan AA, Arif S, Tahir H, Malik AR. Analysis of 300 Medico Legal Cases of Burn In Lahore in 2018 A Retrospective Study. Pak Postgrad Med J. 2018;29(2):45–51.
  10. Fordyce TA, Kelsh M, Lu ET, Sahl JD, Yager JW. Thermal burn and electrical injuries among electric utility workers, 1995–2004. Burns. 2007;33(2):209–20.
  11. Lee KC, Joory K, Moiemen NS. History of burns: The past, present and the future. Burn trauma. 2014;2(4):2321–3868.
  12. Overview Burns and Scalds. NHS Choices. [Updated 2018, cited 2022]. Available from website: [https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/burns-and-scalds/]
  13. Lami FH, Al Naser RK. Epidemiological characteristics of burn injuries in Iraq: A burn hospital-based study. Burns. 2019;45(2):479–83.
  14. Rule of Nines: Why Is It Used? - Healthline. [Updated 2018, cited 2022]. Available from website: [https://www.healthline.com/health/rule-of-nines].
  15. Li H, Yao Z, Tan J, Zhou J, Li Y, Wu J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 6325 burn patients: a five-year retrospective study in a major burn center in Southwest China. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9.
  16. Carlsson A, Udén G, Håkansson A, Karlsson ED. Burn injuries in small children, a population‐based study in Sweden. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15(2):129–34.
  17. Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Dass RM, Giiti G, Chandika AB, Kanumba ES, et al. Pattern of childhood burn injuries and their management outcome at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):1–10.
  18. Lal ST, Bhatti DJ. Burn injury in infants and toddlers: risk factors, circumstances, and prevention. Indian J Burn. 2017;25(1):72.
  19. Mohammadi AA, Amini M, Mehrabani D, Kiani Z, Seddigh A. A survey on 30 months electrical burns in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Burn Hospital. burns. 2008;34(1):111–3.
  20. Alanazi A, Alanazi S, Alanazi M, Alenezi N, Qaisy F, Asiri A, et al. Burn Injuries Prevalence, Causes, Complications and Improvement in Northern Saudi Arabia. EC Emerg Med Crit CARE. 2019;3(6):383–93.
  21. Margolis CG, Domangue BB, Ehleben C, Shrier L. Hypnosis in the early treatment of burns: A pilot study. Am J Clin Hypn. 1983;26(1):9–15.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2022 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.