Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasononography in Detection for Diagnosis of Malignancy of Lymph Nodes in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Carcinoma Patients Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard
Abstract
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosis of malignancy of lymph node in newly diagnosed head and neck carcinomas patients, taking histopathology as gold standard.
This cross-sectional study was undertaken in Department of Radiology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Total 168 newly diagnosed cases with head and neck carcinoma, 20-80 years of age of both genders were selected. All the patients with history of previous neck surgery, on chemotherapy or any other oncology treatment and recurrent cases were excluded. After taking informed consent, ultrasonography of neck was performed. Each USG findings were interpreted by one consultant radiologist and were looked for malignant lymph nodes as per-operational definition. USG findings were compared with histopathology findings.
Age range in this study was from 20-80 years with mean age of 50.33 ± 11.98 years. Majority of the patients 92 (54.76%) were between 20-50 years of age. Out of these 168 patients, 98 (58.33%) were males and 70 (41.67%) were females with ratio of 1.4:1. All the patients were subjected to USG and found that 83 were True Positive and 08 were False Positive. Among 77, USG negative patients, 07 (False Negative) had malignant lymph nodes on histopathology whereas 70 (True Negative) had benign lymph nodes on histopathology (p=0.0001). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosis of malignancy of lymph node in newly diagnosed head and neck carcinomas patients was 92.22%, 89.74%, 91.21%, 90.91% and 91.07% respectively.
This study concluded that ultrasound is a highly sensitive and accurate non-invasive modality for detecting malignant lymph node in head and neck cancers.
How to Cite This Article
Khan AQ, Iqbal H. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasononography in Detection for Diagnosis of Malignancy of Lymph Nodes in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Carcinoma Patients Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2022;3(2):124–128. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v3i2.2224
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this research.
Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.
References
- Gospodarowicz MK, Sobin LH. TNM classification of malignant tumours: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
- Henk J. Concomitant chemoradiation for head and neck cancer: saving lives or grays? Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain). 2001;13(5):333-5.
- Marur S, Forastiere AA, editors. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2016: Elsevier.
- Kallalli BN, Rawson K, Kumari V, Patil S, Singh A, Sulaga S. Comparison between clinical examination, ultrasonography, and computed tomography in assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2016;28(4):364.
- Roberts TJ, Colevas AD, Hara W, Holsinger FC, Oakley‐Girvan I, Divi V. Number of positive nodes is superior to the lymph node ratio and A merican J oint C ommittee on C ancer N staging for the prognosis of surgically treated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer. 2016;122(9):1388-97.
- Burkill G, Evans R, Raman V, Connor S. Modern radiology in the management of head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(7):440-50.
- Frasoldati A, Pacella CM, Papini E, Hegedüs L. Ultrasound of the Neck Lymph Nodes. Thyroid Cancer: Springer; 2016. p. 455-70.
- Mücke T, Mitchell DA, Wagenpfeil S, Ritschl LM, Wolff K-D, Kanatas A. Incidence and outcome for patients with occult lymph node involvement in T1 and T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):1-6.
- Genes I, Mogoanta CA, Lostun G, Lostun A, Mózes H, Huhlfay G. Ultrasonographic and histopathological features of cervical lymph node metastases. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014;55(2):369-75.
- Liao L-J, Lo W-C, Hsu W-L, Wang C-T, Lai M-S. Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck—a meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):1-7.
- Sureshkannan P, John R. Role of ultrasound in detection of metastatic neck nodes in patients with oral cancer. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(3):419.
- Harper JG, Pilcher MF, Szlam S, Lind DS. Squamous cell carcinoma in an African American with discoid lupus erythematosus: a case report and review of the literature. South Med J. 2010;103(3):256-9.
- Tse D, Gilberg S. Malignant eyelid tumors. Cornea. 2005;1(5):476-7.
- Ishii J-i, Amagasa T, Tachibana T, Shinozuka K, Shioda S. US and CT evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis from oral cancer. J Cran Maxillofac Surg. 1991;19(3):123-7.
- Vassallo P, Edel G, Roos N, Naguib A, Peters PE. In-vitro high-resolution ultrasonography of benign and malignant lymph nodes. A sonographic-pathologic correlation. Investigat Radiol. 1993;28(8):698-705.
- Som PM. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(5):961-9.
- Som PM. Lymph nodes of the neck. Radiology. 1987;165(3):593-600.
- DePena C, Van Tassel P, Lee Y. Lymphoma of the head and neck. Radiol Clin North Am. 1990;28(4):723-43.
- Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, Tanaka S, Ito J, Hiraoka M, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography-initial experience. Radiol. 2007;243(1):258-67.
- Magri F, Chytiris S, Capelli V, Alessi S, Nalon E, Rotondi M, et al. Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: feasibility in the case of coexistent chronic autoimmune Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;76(1):137-41.
- Ahuja AT, Ying M, Ho S, Antonio G, Lee Y, King A, et al. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8(1):48.
- Bruneton J-N, Normand F. Cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasonography of the Neck: Springer; 1987. p. 81-92.
- Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):604-10.
- Hasan DI, Ahmed AF, Haggag R. Ultrasound elastography in pathological enlarged cervical lymph nodes compared to histopathology. The Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2016;47(4):1349-59.
- Haberal I, Çelik H, Göçmen H, Akmansu H, Yörük M, Özeri C. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):197-201.
- Anand N, Chaudhary N, Mittal M, Prasad R. Comparison of the efficacy of clinical examination, ultrasound neck and computed tomography in detection and staging of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancers. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;59(1):19-23.
- Saafan M, Elguindy A, Abdel-Aziz M, Younes A, Albirmawy O, Mandour M, et al. Assessment of cervical lymph nodes in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Surgery Curr Res. 2013;3(145):2161-1076.
- Nakamatsu S, Matsusue E, Miyoshi H, Kakite S, Kaminou T, Ogawa T. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and standardized uptake values from FDG PET/CT in metastatic neck lymph nodes of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Imag. 2012;36(2):90-7.
Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.