The Differences in the Measurements of Blood Pressure over BareVersus Sleeved Arm with Routine Clothing in Outdoor Patients
Abstract
To observe the differences in the measurements of the Blood pressure over the sleeved arm with routine clothing versus bare arm. To determine whether these differences were statistically significant in making clinical decisions for treatment of hypertension.
This prospective, Observational study was done in the Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) Muzaffarabad. 100 adult patients attending the medical OPD were included. The first measurement of the blood pressure was taken over the sleeved arm with cloths. For the second measurement, all extra cloths over the shirt (Shawls, Coats, sweaters) were removed and sleeve of the shirt was folded upward to expose the arm and then the Blood pressure was measured over the bare arm. The values were compared by the independent sample t-test and reliability was determined by Cronbach alpha with SPSS-23.
The Mean systolic Blood pressure with Sleeve was 122.62 mmHg (SD ±25.56) and without Sleeve it was120.25 mmHg (SD ±25.48). The mean difference of Blood pressure was 2.37 mmHg. The Mean Diastolic Blood pressure with Sleeve was 75.25 mmHg (SD ±14.20) and without Sleeve it was 75.96 mmHg (SD ±14.26). The mean difference of Blood pressure was 0.7 mmHg. When compared with the paired samples t-test the paired differences were not statistically significant.
The measurement of Blood pressures is only slightly different over the sleeved arm as compared with the bare arm and these trivial differences have no impact in the management decisions of patients.
How to Cite This Article
Khalid A, Rafique R, Arshad M, Hamdani M, Sheikh MN, Zahra S. The Differences in the Measurements of Blood Pressure over BareVersus Sleeved Arm with Routine Clothing in Outdoor Patients. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2023;4(2):120–124. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v4i2.2325
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this research.
Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.
References
- Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS. Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6): e13-e115.
- Leung AA, Daskalopoulou SS, Dasgupta K. Hypertension Canada's 2017 guidelines for diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(3):557–76
- Liu C, Griffiths C, Murray A, Zheng D. Comparison of stethoscope bell and diaphragm, and of stethoscope tube length, for clinical blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit. 2016;21(3):178–83.
- Weir MR. In the clinic: hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):1–15
- Sternbach TJ, Harper S, Li X, Zhang X, Carter E, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of indoor and outdoor temperatures on blood pressure and central hemodynamics in a wintertime longitudinal study of Chinese adults. J Hyperten. 2022;40(10):1950-9.
- McFadden CB. Update in Hypertension. Med Clin North Am. 2022;106(2):259-267.
- Hermida RC, Smolensky MH, Ayala DE, Portaluppi F. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) as the reference standard for diagnosis of hypertension and assessment of vascular risk in adults. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32(10):1329-42.
- Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2005;45(1):142-61.
- Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Enrique. “Karl Samuel Ritter Von Basch: the sphygmomanometer and the Empire.” J Hypertension. 2007;25(6):1507-9.
- Sharman JE, Tan I, Stergiou GS, Lombardi C, Saladini F, Butlin M, et al. Automated ‘oscillometric’blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37(2):93-100.
- Kuo CS, Hwu CM, Kwok CF, Hsiao LC, Weih MJ, Lee SH, Ho LT. Using semi-automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in diabetic patients and their offspring. J Diabetes Complications. 2000;14(5):288-93.
- Berkhof RT, Gazzola K, van den Born B-JH. Effect of self-initiated and fully-automated self-measurement on blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 2020; 34(2): 176-83.
- Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. The conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial: masked hypertension sub-study. J Hypertens. 2012; 30(10): 1937-41.
- Paul Muntner, Daichi Shimbo, Robert M. Carey, Jeanne B. Charleston, Trudy Gaillard, Sanjay Misra et al. Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019;doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087 doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087
- Ertug N, Cakal T, Ozturk SB, Verim M. The effect of clothes on blood pressure measurement. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(1):205-9.
- Ki JH, Oh MK, Lee SH. Differences in Blood Pressure Measurements Obtained Using an Automatic Oscillometric Sphygmomanometer Depending on Clothes-Wearing Status. Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(2):145-51.
- David Seguret, Danae Gamelon, Caoline Dourmap, Olivier Steichen. Blood pressure measurement on a bare arm or below a rolled up sleeve: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Hypertens. 2020;38(9):1650-58.
- Ma G, Sabin N, Dawes M. A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm. CMAJ. 2008;178(5):585-9.
- Ozone S, Shaku F, Sato M, Takayashiki A, Tsutsumi M, Maeno T. Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, over a sleeve and over a rolled-up sleeve in the elderly. Fam Pract. 2016;33(5):517-22.
- Tuğrul E, Karaçam Z. Comparison of blood pressure and pulse readings measured on a bare arm, a clothed arm and on an arm with a rolled-up sleeve. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103506. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103506
Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.