Original Research

Association of Lumbar Spine Degeneration on Magnetic ResonanceImaging (MRI) with Occupational Activity

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v4i4.2362
Received: 21 Jul 2023 Accepted: 21 Aug 2023 Published Online: 29 Nov 2023

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the association of lumbar spine degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging with occupational activity in Pakistani population.

Method

The current cross-sectional study was conducted in Lahore General Hospital's Diagnostic Radiology department for nine months. 146 patients underwent MRI using Siemens 1.5T scanner (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). If found, degenerative alterations in the spine were noticed.

Results

In the high occupational activity group spine degeneration was seen in 46 (95.8%) patients whereas in low and inter spine degeneration group spine degeneration was seen in 83(84.7%) patients (p-value=0.049). In high occupational activity group straightening of spine was seen in 25(52.1%) patients and in low and inter activity group it was seen in 78(79.6%) patients (p-value=0.001). In the high occupational activity group disc bulge was noted in 32(66.7%) patients and in low and inter activity group it was found in 48(49%) patients (p-value=0.044). In high occupational activity group disc protrusion was seen in 30(62.5%) patients and in low and inter activity group it was noted in 81(82.7%) patients (p-value=0.007). In high occupational activity disc extrusion was noted in 7(14.6%) patients and in low and inter activity group it was noted in 4(4.1%) patients (p-value=0.041). In high occupational activity disc desiccation was noted in 27(56.2%) patients and in low and inter activity group it was noted in 37(37.8%) patients (p-value=0.034).

Conclusion

From the findings of this study, we may conclude that lumber spine degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging is significantly higher in high occupational activity group as compared to inter and lower activity group.

Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Occupational Activity Lumbar Spine Degeneration Bacillus CalmetteGuérin (BCG) Vaccination Children Tuberculous meningitis

How to Cite This Article

Tariq Z, Hafeez R, Waheed I. Association of Lumbar Spine Degeneration on Magnetic ResonanceImaging (MRI) with Occupational Activity. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2023;4(4):306–311. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v4i4.2362

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Ract I, Meadeb JM, Mercy G, Cueff F, Husson JL, Guillin R. A review of the value of MRI signs in low back pain. Diagnos Intervent Imag. 2015;96(3):239-49.
  2. Teraguchi M, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Muraki S, Yamada H, Minamide A, et al. Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(1):104-10.
  3. Sääksjärvi S, Kerttula L, Luoma K, Paajanen H, Waris E. Disc Degeneration of Young Low Back Pain Patients: A Prospective 30-year Follow-up MRI Study. Spine. 2020;45(19):1341-7.
  4. Brinjikji W, Diehn FE, Jarvik JG, Carr CM, Kallmes DF, Murad MH, et al. MRI Findings of Disc Degeneration are More Prevalent in Adults with Low Back Pain than in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(12):2394-9.
  5. Kim J-H, van Rijn RM, van Tulder MW, Koes BW, de Boer MR, Ginai AZ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown; a systematic review. Chiropract Manual Therapies. 2018;26(1):37.
  6. Singh R, Kumar P, Wadhwani J, Yadav RK, Khanna M, Kaur S. A comparative study to evaluate disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic low back pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Orthop Trauma Rehabil. 2021;28:Article ID: 22104917211039522.
  7. Lyu F-J, Cui H, Pan H, Mc Cheung K, Cao X, Iatridis JC, et al. Painful intervertebral disc degeneration and inflammation: from laboratory evidence to clinical interventions. Bone Res. 2021;9(1):7.
  8. Videman T, Battié MC. The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine. 1999;24(11):1164-8.
  9. Luoma K, Riihimäki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E. Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scandinavian J Work Environ Health. 1998;24(5):358-66.
  10. Berg AJ, Ahmadje U, Jayanna HH, Trégouët P, Sanville P, Kapoor V. The prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration in symptomatic younger patients: A study of MRI scans. J Clin Orthopaed Trauma. 2020;11(5):932-6.
  11. Steeves J, Tudor-Locke C, Murphy R, King G, Fitzhugh E, Harris T. Classification of occupational activity categories using accelerometry: NHANES 2003-2004. Int J Behav Nut Phy Act. 2015;(89)12:s12966.
  12. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, Bresnahan BW, Chen LE, Deyo RA, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811-6.
  13. Abi-Hanna D, Kerferd J, Phan K, Rao P, Mobbs R. Lumbar Disk Arthroplasty for Degenerative Disk Disease: Literature Review. World Neurosurg. 2018;109(2):188-96.
  14. Teraguchi M, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, Muraki S, Yamada H, Minamide A, et al. Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarth Cartilage. 2014;22(1):104-10.
  15. Urrutia J, Besa P, Campos M, Cikutovic P, Cabezon M, Molina M, et al. The Pfirrmann classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: an independent inter-and intra-observer agreement assessment. Eu Spine J. 2016;25(9):2728-33.
  16. Che Y-J, Guo J-B, Liang T, Chen X, Zhang W, Yang H-L, et al. Assessment of changes in the micro-nano environment of intervertebral disc degeneration based on Pfirrmann grade. Spine J. 2019;19(7):1242-53.
  17. Abdalkader M, Guermazi A, Engebretsen L, Roemer FW, Jarraya M, Hayashi D, et al. MRI-detected spinal disc degenerative changes in athletes participating in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics games. BMC Musculosk Disord. 2020;21(1):1-8.
  18. Suzuki A, Daubs MD, Hayashi T, Ruangchainikom M, Xiong C, Phan K, et al. Patterns of cervical disc degeneration: analysis of magnetic resonance imaging of over 1000 symptomatic subjects. Global Spine J. 2018;8(3):254-9.
  19. Macedo LG, Battié MC. The association between occupational loading and spine degeneration on imaging – a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculosk Disord. 2019;20(1):489.
  20. Donnally III CJ, Hanna A, Varacallo M. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls [Internet]; 2021.
  21. Williams RJ, Tryfonidou MA, Snuggs JW, Le Maitre CL. Cell sources proposed for nucleus pulposus regeneration. JOR Spine. 2021;4(4):e1175.
  22. Solomou A, Kraniotis P. Frequent Benign, Nontraumatic, Noninflammatory Causes of Low Back Pain in Adolescents: MRI Findings. Radiol Res Practice. 2018;Article ID: 7638505.
  23. Martínez-Quiñones JV, Aso-Escario J, González-García L, Consolini F, Arregui-Calvo R. Are Modic Changes Able to Help Us in Our Clinical Practice? A Study of the Modic Changes in Young Adults During Working Age. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(6):259-64.
  24. Hartwig E, Schultheiss M, Krämer S, Ebert V, Kinzl L, Kramer M. [Occupational disease 2108. Degenerative changes of the cervical spine as a causality criterion in the assessment of discogenic diseases according to BeKV 2108]. Der Unfallchirurg. 2003;106(4):306-12.
  25. Kwon B, Roffey D, Bishop P, Dagenais S, Wai E. Systematic review: occupational physical activity and low back pain. Occupation Med. 2011;61(8):541-8.
  26. Beaton R, Murphy S, Salazar M, Johnson LC. Neck, back, and shoulder pain complaints in urban firefighters: The benefits of aerobic exercise. J Musculosk Pain. 2002;10(3):57-67.
  27. Videman T, Gibbons LE, Kaprio J, Battié MC. Challenging the cumulative injury model: positive effects of greater body mass on disc degeneration. Spine J. 2010;10(1):26-31.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2023 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.