Original Research

Congenital Birth Defects Contributing to Neonatal Mortality in Hospitalized Newborns

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v5i4.2467
Received: 25 Mar 2024 Accepted: 05 Nov 2024 Published Online: 09 Dec 2024

Abstract

Objective

To determine the contribution of congenital defects towards mortality in hospitalized newborn babies.

Methods

This cross-sectional descriptive study was done at the Nursery of Mayo Hospital Lahore from 2019 to 2023. All
electronic entries of neonatal mortality were reviewed. Neonatal Mortality having congenital defects was taken. Data was
compiled, tabulated and analyzed on SPSS.

Results

218 neonatal mortalities were reported to have obvious congenital defects, making 7.8% of total neonatal
mortality. However, it had no uniform pattern in the last 5 years. It ranged from 12.5% to 5.2% annually. The most common
congenital defects in Neonatal Mortality were suspected congenital heart disease (45%), CNS malformations, chiefly
spinal dysraphism (16%), urogenital defects including ambiguous genitalia, pulmonary system including Diaphragmatic
hernia and Syndromes. The most common primary diseases under treatment at the nursery leading to death in congenital defects
were sepsis (43.1%) and Birth Asphyxia (25.7%). Gender variation had no significance on overall neonatal mortality.

Conclusion

Congenital defects have significant contribution towards neonatal mortality in the hospital nursery.

Keywords
Neonatal Mortality Congenital defects Nursery.

How to Cite This Article

Bajwa MA, Ahmed QM, Akhtar MK, Aziz S, Arshad N, Iqbal T. Congenital Birth Defects Contributing to Neonatal Mortality in Hospitalized Newborns. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2024;5(4):699–702. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v5i4.2467

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. El Koumi MA, Al Banna EA, Lebda I. In: Pattern of Congenital anomalies in newborn: a hospital-based study. Pediatr Rep 2013 Feb 5;5(1):e5. Published online 2013 Feb 5.doi:10.4081/pr.2013.e5. doi:10.4081/pr.2013.e5
  2. Christianson A, Horson C.P., & Modell B. (2006)In: March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects: the Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children. Electronic
  3. Czeizel AE. In: Birth Defects are preventable. International journal of Med Sci.2005;2(3):91-92. doi:10.7150/ijms.2.91.(Pub Med)(Cross ref)(Google Scolar) doi:10.7150/ijms.2.91.(Pub
  4. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shi buya K, Aboyano V and et al.In: Global and Regional Mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysisfor the Global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2095-128. doi 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0.(Pub Med) doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61728-0.(Pub
  5. World Health Organization. Newborn Mortality.Home/Newsroom/Fact sheets/ Detail/Newborn Mortality. January 28,2022.
  6. Goal 3—Department of Ecnomics and Social Affairs.2021. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3. Accessed june01,2023.
  7. R Balaranjan et al. In: Mortality from Congenital malformations in England and Wales:variations by mothers country of birth. ArchDis child 1989 Oct. (free PMC article) (Pub Med)
  8. Birth Defects. Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
  9. Interactive charts and maps those Rank Congenital anomalies as a cause of Death for every country in the world. Death Rate per 100,000 live births. World life expectancy.com. Accessed February 05,2024.
  10. Goswami P,Memon S,Khiamani V ,et al. Frequency and variation of neural tube defects at Liaquat National University Hospital Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3:1707-1711.doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150256 doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150256
  11. Saleem M,Ali, Hussnain Q, et al.Prevelance and associated risk factors for neural tube defects in patients at Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan. Pak J Med Sci. 2010;4:197-202.
  12. Zaganjor I,Sekkarie A,Tsang BL,et al. Describing the prevalence neural tube defects worldwide: a systematic literature review. PLoSOne.2016;11(4):e0151586.doi:10.1371/journal.pone0151586 [PMC free article] [Pub Med] [crossRef][Google Scholar] doi:10.1371/journal.pone0151586
  13. Naibzai ZK, Buzdar AA, Khalid M, Fatima Najma, Khalid N, khan Z. Prevelance and Pattern of Congenital Malformations among Neonates in the Neonatal Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Pak Med & Health Sci 2022; vol 16 No.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pimhs221610372 doi:10.53350/pimhs221610372
  14. Hussain S, Asghar I, Sabir MU, Chattha MN, Tarar SH, Mushtaq R. Prevelance and pattern of congenital malformations among neonates in the neonatal unit of a teaching hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64:629-34.
  15. Perveen F,Tyyab S. Frequency and pattern of distribution of Congenital anomalies in the newborn and associated maternal risk factors. Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17:340-3.
  16. Gustavson KH. Prevelance and aetiology of congenital birth defects, infant mortality and mental retardation in Lahore, Pakistan: a prospective cohort study. Acta Paediatr 2005;94:769-74.
  17. Jabeen N, Malik S. Consanguinity and its sociodemographic differentials in Bhimber District Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014; 32:301-13.
  18. Riaz HF,Mannan S, Malik S. Consanguinity and its sociobiological parameters in Rahim Yar Khan District, Southern Punjab , Pakistan. J Health Pop Nutr. 2016;35:14. doi: 10.1186/s41043-016-0049. doi:10.1186/s41043-016-0049
  19. Birth defects. Accessed August 20,2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
  20. Demitto MO,Gravena AA,Dell,Agnoio CM,Antunes MB,Pelloso SM. High risk pregnancies and factors associated with neonatal death. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2017;51:e03208.doi:10.1590/S1980-220X2016127103208. doi:10.1590/S1980-220X2016127103208
  21. Aziz A,Saleem S, Nolen TL et al. Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? J. Reprod Health17(suppl 3), 190(2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 doi:10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2024 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.