Rate of complete response on weekly Bortezomib–Cyclophosphamide–Dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a 12‑week: A Real-World Evidence
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the rate of complete response after three cycles (12 weeks) of weekly VCD and to observe toxicity and early progression.
We conducted a prospective, observational study at a tertiary cancer center in Lahore, Pakistan. Sixty newly diagnosed symptomatic MM patients received weekly VCD for three 28‑day cycles. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 8, and 15, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² orally on days 1, 8, and 15, and dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 8, and 15. Responses were assessed at week 12 using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response (VGPR) rate, and grade ≥3 toxicities.
The cohort (median age 60 years) comprised 33 men and 27 women. Baseline International Staging System (ISS) distribution was 33.3 % ISS I, 30 % ISS II and 36.7 % ISS III. After 12 weeks, the ORR was 88.3 %. CR occurred in 10 patients (16.7 %), VGPR in 18 (30 %), partial response (PR) in 25 (41.7 %), minimal response (MR) in 3 (5 %), stable disease (SD) in 3 (5 %) and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (1.7 %). Grade ≥3 toxicities included neutropenia (10 %), anemia (6.7 %), thrombocytopenia (5 %), infections (3.3 %), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (1.7 %). There were no treatment‑related deaths.
Weekly VCD achieved a high ORR and acceptable safety at 12 weeks in this real‑world cohort. The CR rate compares favorably with published data for weekly VCD in elderly patients. Weekly dosing may reduce treatment burden and toxicity, making it suitable for resource‑limited settings. A longer follow‑up will determine the durability of the response and survival.
How to Cite This Article
Zia FM, Ameen A, Azhar F, Tariq R, Manzoor M. Rate of complete response on weekly Bortezomib–Cyclophosphamide–Dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a 12‑week: A Real-World Evidence. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2025;6(4):321–326. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v6i4.2559
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
No specific funding was received for this research.
Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.
References
- Gay F, Marchetti E, Bertuglia G. Multiple Myeloma Unpacked. Hematol Oncol. 2025;43(Suppl 2):e70067.
- Burton B, Brown R. StatPearls: multiple myeloma. StatPearls Publishing. 2023. Accessed from [ncbi.nlm.nih.gov].
- Hines O, Kumar SK. Multiple myeloma: update on diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(3):339‑51.
- Landgren O, Palumbo A, Kyle RA. Revisiting the International Staging System and high‑risk cytogenetic features in multiple myeloma. International Myeloma Foundation; updated 2024. Accessed from: [myeloma.org]
- Ailawadhi S, Weber DM, Chanan‑Khan A. Real‑world outcomes with bortezomib, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide combinations: once‑weekly dosing and tolerability. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23(2):104-111.
- Richardson PG, Jacobus S, Hideshima T. Functional cure and long‑term survival in multiple myeloma: current status and future directions. Haematologica. 2024;109(8):1009‑22.
- Banerjee R, Wang B, Anderson LD Jr, McCaughan G, Mehra N, Cowan AJ, et al. Once-weekly bortezomib as the standard of care in multiple myeloma: results from an international survey of physicians. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13(1):162.
- Liapis K, Panitsas F, Hatzileontiadou S, Papadakis S, Liapis I, Vrachiolias G, et al.Weekly cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (VCD) in elderly transplant‑ineligible multiple myeloma: a multicentre study. EHA Library. 2021;abstract EP964.
- Hoff FW, Banerjee R, Khan AM, McCaughan G, Wang B, Wang X, et al. Once-weekly versus twice-weekly bortezomib in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a real-world analysis. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):52.
- Derudas D, Capraro F, Martinelli G, Cerchione C. How I manage frontline transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. Hematol Rep. 2020;12(Suppl 1):8956.
- Mollee P, Reynolds J, Janowski W, Quach H, Campbell P, Gibbs S, et al. Daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible myeloma: AMaRC 03-16. Blood Adv. 2024;8(14):3721-30.
- Saeed N, Khan Z, Jehanzeb H, Shaikh T, Shaikh U, Adil SN, et al. Real-World Outcomes in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib/Cyclophosphamide/Dexamethasone and Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone as Upfront Treatment. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e58999.
- Kastritis E, Beksac M, Badelita SN, Katodritou E, Bila J, Spanoudakis E, et al. VCd versus VRd in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Matched Real-World Analysis from the Balkan Myeloma Study Group (BMSG). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025;25(2):e71-e81.
- Jung J, Kim K, Jung SH, Yoon SS, Lee JH, Kim JS, et al. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone consolidation in patients with multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation: the KMM130 study. Cancer Res Treat. 2023;55(2):693-703.
- Derudas D, Capraro F, Martinelli G, Cerchione C. How I manage frontline transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma. Hematol Rep. 2020;12(Suppl 1):8956.
- Kim K, Verburgh E, Mitina T, Chen W, Yeh SP, Schutz N, et al. Treatment pathways and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma outside Europe and North America: The integrate study. Int J Hematol. 2025;122(2):231-46.
- Kort J, Rivera A, Senigarapu S, Driscoll JJ. Revolutions at the frontline of multiple myeloma treatment: lessons and challenges to finding a cure. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1578529.
- Dolph M, Tremblay G, Gilligan AM, Leong H. Network Meta-Analysis of Once Weekly Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2021;8(2):26-35.
- Elbezanti WO, Challagundla KB, Jonnalagadda SC, Budak-Alpdogan T, Pandey MK. Multiple Myeloma Pathogenesis and The Existing Therapies. Encyclopedia. Accessed from [https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/42279].
Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.