Original Research

Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Assumptions about AI in Clinical Practice among Final-Year Medical Students and Internees in Peripheral Hospitals of Sialkot, Pakistan

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v7i3.2637
Received: 07 Oct 2025 Revised: 12 Jun 2026 Accepted: 12 Aug 2026 Published Online: 21 Aug 2026

Abstract

Objectives

The present study evaluated the level of knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of young physicians and final-year medical students on AI in healthcare, specifically in antibiotic selection.

Methods

A structured questionnaire and descriptive statistics in a cross-sectional survey of 400 participants (221 final-year students, 179 house officers).

Results

Out of the respondents, 52.7% were female largely aged between 24-26 years. There was a high awareness of AI (79.7%), primarily through self-study and Internet sources (69.5%). Though 73.3% found AI helpful in antibiotic selection, only 38.5% partly and 27% completely agree to use it to inform prescribing, and decisions to prescribe still lie with physicians. Data privacy was also a concern (36.5%), as well as inappropriate recommendations (32.5%), and the absence of empathy (31%). Interestingly enough, 84 percent of participants did not receive formal AI training, but 77.3 percent supported its presence in the curriculum.

Conclusion

Young doctors and medical students are optimistic (but careful) about AI in healthcare. Potentially this would be useful in antibiotic stewardship, although safety, training and ethical issues have indicated that it is not something that should be introduced without some kind of formal education and evidence-based advice.

Keywords
Artificial intelligence Healthcare Antibiotic prescribing Perceptions Curriculum

How to Cite This Article

Eatsham MU, Rajput NR, Niamat H, Eman M, Bashir H, Sajjad M. Awareness, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Assumptions about AI in Clinical Practice among Final-Year Medical Students and Internees in Peripheral Hospitals of Sialkot, Pakistan. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2026;7(3):191–196. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v7i3.2637

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

Ethics Statement

not_applicable

Conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. Olawade DB, David-Olawade AC, Wada OZ, Asaolu AJ, Adereni T, Ling J. Artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery: Prospects and pitfalls. J Med Surg Public Health. 2024;3(1):100108.
  2. Pinto A, Pennisi F, Ricciardi GE, Signorelli C, Gianfredi V. Evaluating the impact of artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a comparative meta-analysis with traditional risk scoring systems. Infect Dis Now. 2025;55(5):105090.
  3. Ahmed SK, Hussein S, Qurbani K, Ibrahim RH, Fareeq A, Mahmood KA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J Med Surg Public Health. 2024;2(1):100081.
  4. Giordano C, Brennan M, Mohamed B, Rashidi P, Modave F, Tighe P. Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making. Front Digit Health. 2021;3:645232.
  5. Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence for medical education: potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22-7.
  6. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Edu. 2019;5(1):e13930.
  7. Pucchio A, Rathagirishnan R, Caton N, Gariscsak PJ, Del Papa J, Nabhen JJ, et al. Exploration of exposure to artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a Canadian cross-sectional mixed-methods study. BMC Med Edu. 2022;22(1):815.
  8. Blanco MA, Nelson SW, Ramesh S, Callahan CE, Josephs KA, Jacque B, et al. Integrating artificial intelligence into medical education: a roadmap informed by a survey of faculty and students. Med Educ Online. 2025;30(1):2531177.
  9. Chen M, Zhang B, Cai Z, Seery S, Gonzalez MJ, Ali NM, et al. Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9(1):990604.
  10. Buabbas AJ, Miskin B, Alnaqi AA, Ayed AK, Shehab AA, Syed-Abdul S, et al. Investigating students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence in medical education. Healthcare; 2023;11(9): 1298.
  11. Rani S, Kumari A, Ekka SC, Chakraborty R, Ekka S. Perception of Medical Students and Faculty Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2025;17(1): e77514.
  12. Salih SM. Perceptions of faculty and students about use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a qualitative study. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57605.
  13. Neugebauer M, Ebert M, Vogelmann R. A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):185.
  14. Oonsivilai M, Mo Y, Luangasanatip N, Lubell Y, Miliya T, Tan P, et al. Using machine learning to guide targeted and locally-tailored empiric antibiotic prescribing in a children's hospital in Cambodia. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3(1):131.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2026 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.