Original Research

Sensitivity of Mixed and Comparative Electrodiagnostic Methods in Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v7i3.2641
Received: 23 Dec 2025 Revised: 29 May 2026 Accepted: 12 Aug 2026 Published Online: 21 Aug 2026

Abstract

Objectives

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a prevalent mononeuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical to prevent progressive nerve damage and optimize patient outcomes. This study compared the sensitivity of mixed and comparative electrodiagnostic methods in diagnosing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, particularly in early stages, to enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide management strategies.

Methods

The comparative assessment between Median and Ulnar nerves in the Lumbrical Interossei muscles demonstrated the highest sensitivity (84.8%), followed by the Median-Ulnar fourth digit comparison (75.0%) and the Median versus Radial Digit One study (69.1%). Mixed palmar and segmental studies had lower sensitivity (61.3% and 51.9%, respectively). Conventional methods, including median motor and sensory studies, demonstrated limited accuracy (53% to 57%). Females were predominant (2.3:1 ratio), and 75% of patients had bilateral symptoms.

Results

Among all techniques evaluated, the Median-Ulnar Lumbrical Interossei comparison demonstrated the highest sensitivity (84.8%), followed by the Median-Ulnar fourth digit comparison (75.0%) and the Median versus Radial Digit One study (69.1%). In contrast, the mixed palmar study and segmental study showed lower sensitivity (61.3% and 51.9%, respectively). Conventional electrodiagnostic approaches, including median motor and sensory studies, had limited diagnostic accuracy (53% to 57%). Females were predominate (2.3:1), and bilateral symptoms were observed in 75% of the patients.

Conclusion

Conventional electrodiagnostic approaches have limited sensitivity in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome, particularly in cases of mild-to-moderate severity. Comparative studies, such as the Median versus Ulnar Lumbrical Interossei and Median versus Ulnar Digit Four studies, significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. Integrating these advanced methods into routine protocols is essential to minimize false-negative results and enhance early detection.

Keywords
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Electrodiagnosis Comparative Studies Diagnostic Sensitivity

How to Cite This Article

Fatima N, Bano S, Zaheer M, Nawaz A, Numan A. Sensitivity of Mixed and Comparative Electrodiagnostic Methods in Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2026;7(3):213–218. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v7i3.2641

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

Ethics Statement

not_applicable

Conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. Dahlin LB, Zimmerman M, Calcagni M, Hundepool CA, van Alfen N, Chung KC . Carpal tunnel syndrome (Primer). Nat Rev: Dis Primers. 2024;10(1):37.
  2. Zamborsky R, Kokavec M, Simko L, Bohac M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: symptoms, causes and treatment options. Literature review. Ortoped Traumatol Rehab. 2017;19(1):1-8.
  3. Melhorn JM, Talmage JB. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in motorcyclists. Orthopedics. 2013;36(7):497-8.
  4. Salamh F, Habib SS, AlRouq F, Albarrak A, Al-Khlaiwi T, Khan A. A. Relationship of obesity indices with clinical severity and nerve conduction studies in females presenting with median nerve compression neuropathy at the wrist. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2024 Apr 1;13(4):1291-5.
  5. Dabbagh A, MacDermid JC, Yong , Packham TL, Grewal R, Boutsikari EC. Diagnostic test accuracy of provocative maneuvers for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2023;103(6):pzad029 .
  6. Mazaheri S, Poorolajal J, Mazaheri A. Sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic parameters in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case-control study. Bone Joint Open. 2024;5(10):898.
  7. Owolabi LF, Reda AA, Raafat A, Fares DM, Enwere OO, Mba UA, et al. Nerve conduction study findings and their predictors in clinically diagnosed patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in a Saudi population. Nig J Clin Pract. 2021;24(10):1423-9.
  8. Jain D, Saini PK, Sharma CM. Comparative analysis of nerve conduction study methods in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Indian J Med Special. 2019;10(3):131-6.
  9. Srikanteswara PK, Cheluvaiah JD, Agadi JB, Nagaraj K. The relationship between nerve conduction study and clinical grading of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Diag Res.2017;11(7):OC13-OC16 .
  10. El-Hady AO. The sensitivity of median versus ulnar palmar mixed nerve study in the early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol Rehab. 2023;50(1):1.
  11. Chang YW, Hsieh TC, Tzeng IS, Chiu V, Huang PJ, Horng YS. Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study. BMC Med Imag. 2019;19:1-9.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2026 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.