Original Research

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Spinal Versus GeneralAnesthesia on Apgar Score of the Neonates Among Patients EnduringElective Caesarean Section

Umar Iqbal1
Rashid Latif Medical College Lahore
Imran Masood Butt1
Rashid Latif Medical College Lahore
Muhammad Saqib2
Punjab Institute of Neurosciences Lahore
Muhammad Aslam Khan3
Children Hospital Lahore
Mudassar Ali1
Rashid Latif Medical College Lahore
Fareeha Sheikh4
Allama Iqbal Medical College Lahore

✉ Correspondence: Umar Iqbal Email: umariqbal41411@import.invalid

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v6i1.2508
Volume: 6, Issue 1 Pages: 38–41 Published: 10 Mar 2025
Received: 10 Apr 2024 Revised: 17 Jan 2025 Accepted: 22 Feb 2025 Published Online: 10 Mar 2025

Abstract

Objective

This study investigates the impact of anesthesia choices on maternal and neonatal outcomes during elective cesarean sections, comparing spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia.

Methods

Conducted over a year at the Department of Gynecology, Divisional Women's University of Dera Ismail Khan, the study involved 100 ASA-I patients scheduled for elective cesarean sections. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (spinal anesthesia, n = 55) and Group B (general anesthesia, n = 45). Comprehensive monitoring and statistical analyses, utilizing SPSS version 22.0, were employed to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes.

Results

While both groups had similar mean ages, Group A had a slightly higher mean weight. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in Apgar scores at 1 minute, but at 5 minutes, Group B showed significantly higher Apgar scores (P = 0.001) and lower pH levels (P = 0.016). Group A exhibited a higher percentage of infants in satisfactory condition (96.7%) compared to Group B (86.7%) at 5 minutes.

Conclusion

The study underscores the advantages of spinal anesthesia, presenting better Apgar scores at 1 minute and a higher percentage of infants in satisfactory condition at 5 minutes. These findings support the strategic use of spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean sections, emphasizing improved neonatal outcomes and maternal satisfaction. However, limitations such as sample size and exclusion of emergency cases warrant caution in generalizing the results.

Keywords
Anesthesia Cesarean section Spinal anesthesia General anesthesia Apgar score Maternal outcomes Neonatal outcomes Elective cesarean section.

How to Cite This Article

Iqbal U, Butt IM, Saqib M, Khan MA, Ali M, Sheikh F. A Comparative Study on the Effects of Spinal Versus GeneralAnesthesia on Apgar Score of the Neonates Among Patients EnduringElective Caesarean Section. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2025;6(1):38–41. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v6i1.2508

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Khan MN, Zubair H, Akram S, Perveen S, Fatima A. A Comparative Study on the Effects of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia on Apgar Score of the Neonates among Patients Enduring Elective Caesarean Section. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(04):526-8.
  2. Madkour N, Ibrahim S, Ezz G. General versus spinal anesthesia during elective cesarean section in term low-risk pregnancy as regards maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Res Opin Anesth Intens Care. 2019;6(1):119-24.
  3. Kim WH, Hur M, Park SK, Yoo S, Lim T, Yoon HK, Kim JT, Bahk JH. Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;37(1):5-15.
  4. Solangi SA, Khaskheli MS, Siddiqui MA. Comparison of the effects of general vs spinal anesthesia on neonatal outcome. Anesth Pain Intens Care. 2019;16(1):18-23.
  5. Mehdi EI, Mnati ZM. Comparison between effect of general and spinal anesthesia on apgar scores in the neonates delivered by electives cesarean sections. Pak J Biotechnol. 2018;15(2):261-4.
  6. Sung TY, Jee YS, You HJ, Cho CK. Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;16(1):49-55.
  7. Obi V, Umeora OJ. Anesthesia for emergency cesarean section: A comparison of spinal versus general anesthesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Af J Med Health Sci. 2018;17(1):31-3.
  8. Munir SI, Shahzadi I, Tahira T, Aslam S. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome of General Anesthesia vs Spinal Anesthesia in Women Having Elective Cesarean Section. Ann Punjab Med Col. 2019;13(2):100-3.
  9. Bakhsha F, Yousefi Z, Aryaie M, Jafari SY, Tofighi RA, Abbasi A. Comparison of Apgar score in new born by vaginal delivery and spinal anesthesia and its relationship with contributing factors.
  10. Naseer SK, Ali A, Feroz SH, Sohail A. Comparison of neonatal apgar scores and patient satisfaction levels in spinal versus general anesthesia in elective cesarean sections. Pak Arm Forces Med J. 2021;71(4):1183-87.
  11. Zahid B, Khan MB, Hanif MZ, Tahir A, Nazeer T, Kazmi SS. APGAR score: comparison of general anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia. Biolog Clin Sci Res J. 2023;2023(1):474-.
  12. Al-Husban N, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Husban H, Nabhan M, Abuhalaweh H, Alkhatib YM. Anesthesia for cesarean section: retrospective comparative study. Int J Women Health. 2021:141-52.
  13. Khan ZH, Eftekhar N, Barrak RS. General versus spinal anesthesia during caesarean section: a narrative review. Arch Anesthesiol Crit Care. 2019;5(1):18-21.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2025 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.
📃 In This Issue View All
Review Article Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Emerging Trends Hussain I, Farooq Z Original Article Prevalence of Hypertension Among Urban Adults in Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study Khan TM, Ahmed S, Malik RA Original Article Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Post-Operative Wound Healing in General Surgery Siddiqui FA, Noor M, Akhtar W Original Article Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided versus Landmark-Based Central Venous Catheter Insertion Zafar S, Gillani SA Original Article Cervical Cancer Screening Awareness Among Rural Women in Punjab Bibi S, Anjum R, Hassan F
👥 More by These Authors
Original Article Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Analysis Raza SH, Butt N, Qureshi AM Review Article Thyroid Disorders in Pregnancy: Clinical Implications and Management Strategies Baig BI, Usman A Review Article Statin Therapy in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review Nawaz F, Cheema HA, Mehmood Y Original Article Serum Ferritin as a Prognostic Marker in COVID-19 Severity: A Hospital-Based Study Rehman N, Sheikh I, Javed K
🔗 Related Articles By Keywords
Original Article Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Post-Operative Wound Healing in General Surgery Siddiqui FA, Noor M, Akhtar W Original Article Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided versus Landmark-Based Central Venous Catheter Insertion Zafar S, Gillani SA Original Article Cervical Cancer Screening Awareness Among Rural Women in Punjab Bibi S, Anjum R, Hassan F Original Article Neonatal Sepsis: Bacteriological Profile and Antibiogram in a Tertiary Care Hospital Iqbal M, Rashid T