Original Research

Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology for Biliary Strictures During ERCP

DOI https://doi.org/10.70302/jpsim.v6i1.2503
Received: 10 Sep 2024 Revised: 16 Jan 2025 Accepted: 24 Feb 2025 Published Online: 10 Mar 2025

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the yield of brush cytology in patients with biliary strictures detected at ERCP when a systematic approach is used and when a dedicated pathologist performs the cytological analysis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to assess the accuracy of diagnostic brush cytology during ERCP for biliary stenosis. The study included patients with biliary strictures identified during ERCP who experienced biliary brushing cytology. We reviewed all ERCPs carried out from January, 2021 to June, 2024 in the department of Gastroenterology at Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital Lahore and Fatima Memorial Hospital Lahore. During a standard ERCP, a brush specimen was collected, and the cytology sample was promptly transferred to a glass slide by the nursing staff, who smeared the cellular material directly from brush onto the slide. The slides were then immersed in a fixative (alcohol). Subsequently, a dedicated pathologist performed the cytological analysis and categorized the samples in 3 categories: positive for malignancy, negative for malignancy, or invalid.

Results

A total of 126 patients underwent brushing for cytology in strictures seen at ERCP. There were 44 females and 82 males; 33.3% of the patients were between 45 and 65 years of age and 66.7% were older than 65 years. Overall sensitivity was 62.0% (78.0% in males and 53.0% in females).

Conclusion

Study concluded that brushing the biliary strictures for cytology is a sensitive method for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. Using a rapid fixing technique and single dedicated pathologist reviewing the slides appears to be the reason for this high yield.

Keywords
Biliary strictures ERCP brush cytology diagnostic yield dedicated pathologist.

How to Cite This Article

Riaz M, Yousaf S, Irfan HM, Kazi A, Aziz A, Rashid A. Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology for Biliary Strictures During ERCP. J Pak Soc Intern Med. 2025;6(1):11–15. doi:10.70302/jpsim.v6i1.2503

⭳ Download PDF

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Disclosed in accordance with ICMJE and COPE guidelines.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this research.

Funder information follows the Crossref Funder Registry standard.

References

  1. Isram J, Haider E, Khan RSA, Hafeez M., Hinna RE, Baig I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for detection of the etiology of obstructive jaundice. Cureus, 2023; 15(2): e34484.
  2. Dorrell R, Pawa S, Pawa, R. Endoscopic management of malignant biliary stricture. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(6): 390.
  3. Desai R, Addanki T, Ansari A, Sam J, Kapa T, Marrium A, et al. Rapid development of esophageal stricture in the setting of lung adenocarcinoma. Chest. 2023; 164(4): A4333-4.
  4. Mathew P, Kanni P, Gowda M, Devarapu C, Ansari J, Garg A, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based brush cytology for tissue diagnosis in malignant biliary obstruction. Cureus. 2022; 14(10): e30291.
  5. Kamp EJCA, Dinjens WNM, Doukas M, Bruno MJ, de Jonge PJF, Peppelenbosch MP, et al. Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848211002023 doi:10.1177/17562848211002023
  6. Yoon SB, Moon SH, Ko SW, Lim H, Kang HS, Kim JH. Brush cytology, forceps biopsy, or endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling for diagnosis of bile duct cancer: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2022; 67(7): 3284-97.
  7. Nur AM, Salim M, Boerner S, Li S, Law CCY, Edwards L, Ryan K, et al. High diagnostic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush cytology for indeterminate strictures. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022; 5(5): 234-9.
  8. Nawaz A, Kafi A, Riaz M, Irfan M, Iftikhar M, Alvi A, et al. Diagnostic yield of brush cytology for biliary strictures during ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108(suppl-1): S89-90.
  9. Ding SM, Lu AL, Xu BQ, Shi SH, Edoo MIA, Zheng SS, et al. Accuracy of brush cytology in biliopancreatic strictures: a single-center cohort study. J Int Med Res. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520987771. doi:10.1177/0300060520987771
  10. Sethi R, Singh K, Warner B, Mahadeva U, Wilkinson M. The impact of brush cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patient management at a UK teaching hospital. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016;https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2015-100643 doi:10.1136/flgastro-2015-100643
  11. Shieh FK, Luong-Player A, Khara HS, Liu H, Lin F, Shellenberger MJ, et al. Improved endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush increases diagnostic yield of malignant biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 6(7): 312-7.
  12. Abbasi MR, Mirsaeed SMG, Alizadeh AHM. Diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures: conventional or negative pressure brush cytology? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17(10): 4563-6.
  13. Ödemiş UB, Turhan N, Parlak E, Dişibeyaz S, Suna N, Öztaş E, et al. The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/580254 doi:10.1155/2015/580254
  14. Archibugi L, Mariani A, Ciambriello B, Petrone MC, Rossi G, Testoni SGG, et al. High sensitivity of ROSE-supported ERCP-guided brushing for biliary strictures. Endosc Int Open. 2021;https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1322-2638 doi:10.1055/a-1322-2638
  15. Keshari R. Evaluation of malignant biliary tract strictures with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided brush cytology. JPTCP. 2023; 30(17): 527-34.
  16. Juvvala K, Bajwa M, Bank L, Marhaba A. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: S1517.
  17. Eiholm S, Thielsen P, Kromann-Andersen H. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable. Dan Med J. 2013; 60(7): A4656.
  18. Elzubier M, Majumdar D, Mitra V. Diagnostic performance of ERCP guided biliary brush cytology– experience from a non-HPB centre in UK. GUT. 2019; 68(2): A20–1.
  19. Costa M, Canena J, Mascarenhas-Lemos L, Loureiro R, Silva M, Carvalho D, et al. Outcomes of Different methods for analysis of biliary brush cytology and of factors associated with positive diagnosis in an age-dependent retrospective review. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019;https://doi.org/10.1159/000487153 doi:10.1159/000487153
  20. Gorris M, van Huijgevoort NCM, Fockens P, Meijer SL, Verheij J, Voermans RP, et al. Comparison of two intraductal brush cytology devices for suspected malignant biliary strictures: randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(6): 4566-73.
  21. Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1): 168-76.

Reference list indexed for Google Scholar and ResearchGate. DOI links resolve via doi.org.

CC BY CC BY 4.0 This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. May be shared and adapted with attribution. © 2025 Journal of Pakistan Society of Internal Medicine.